Androgyne

Everyone, male or female biologically, has masculine and feminine attributes socially and psychologically, apparently. So it does not matter if one uses Britney or..? for a girl's name or a boy's name,one suggests inasmuch as women have more freedom in society to express themselves than men,and men will begin to have more freedom to express themselves in terms of their feminine attributes in order to restore the balance if able to use traditionally feminine names as well as masculine names pehaps,so suggest that a boy have a girl's name and a boy's name to cover both bases be an accepted practise soon. An Episcopalian Bishop,in the United States of America,was both types by own biological parents, apparently,one sounding off, thinks as the case,videlicit a boy's name and a girl's name. Think perhaps it would be a mistake just to give a boy:a girl's name when if, on the other hand, if given a girl's name as well as a boy's name it opens up the field of acceptance for making both names traditionally regarded as a boy's name and as a girl's name as now perhaps a trend where sexuality is not of paramount value rather the name is just a handle for either a girl or a boy to use irrespectively whether a girl's name or a boy's name traditionally and so a new trend might catch on and gain acceptance where a boy has just as much amplitude of expression using a girl's name as much as a boy's name just as a girl has now freedom to use either type of name as only a handle, to some extent.

This Episcopalian Bishop wss given a girl's name and a boy's name and eventually chose to be gay whereupon his wife, Boo, then left him.

Consider too the Canadian respected:"The Globe and Mail"newspaper issue for Friday d3.mVii.y20009 where a 105 page judgement by a Judge in Republic of India, the world most populous democracy, lifted a sex ban
making homosexuality:a more acceptable practice as a possibility gradually gaining more acceptance inasmuch as the value of 'inclusiveness' is a deeply held value in India as the basis for the acceptance of the Judge passing a well expressed judgment on the subject of now no sex ban being the ruling.

Maybe the laggard?United States of America behind the newness of the Judge's decision might stand up and take note and play catchup if it can put aside its own
self-interest consideratons and make a few changes legally in the light that it lives in the same world as all the other nation-states who vote at the United Nations General Assembly building in NYC , N.Y.,The
Great United States of America, in the light thst full acceptance of a homosexual lifestyle is gaining more acceptance in other nation-states, say Canada where the Supreme Court has been a pioneer in granting fuller acceptance legally for homosexual benefits by the federal government,partly due to the efforts of the pioneer United Church of Canada et alii to get social and psychological acceptance for homosexuals years ago bearing fruit now in terms of legal acceptance more so , relatively recently. Thank you.
-anonymous